↓ Skip to main content

Spin crossover in discrete polynuclear iron( ii ) complexes

Overview of attention for article published in Chemical Society Reviews, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Readers on

mendeley
192 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Spin crossover in discrete polynuclear iron( ii ) complexes
Published in
Chemical Society Reviews, January 2018
DOI 10.1039/c7cs00835j
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Iron(ii) spin crossover (SCO) materials have been widely studied as molecular switches with a wide variety of potential applications, including as displays, sensors, actuators or memory components. Most SCO materials have been either monometallic or polymeric, and it is only relatively recently that chemists have really started to focus on linking multiple metal centres together within the one, discrete, molecule in an effort to enhance the SCO properties, such as abrupt, hysteretic, and multistep switching, as well as the potential for quantum cellular automata, whilst still being readily amenable to characterisation. Here we present a review of the ligand designs of the last two decades that have led to self assembly of discrete di- to poly-nuclear iron(ii) complexes of helicate, cage, cube, and other supramolecular architectures with rich SCO activity, and to an increased focus on host-guest interactions. Analysis of selected octahedral distortion parameters (Σ, CShM) reveals interesting differences between these structural types, for example that the iron(ii) centres in grids are generally significantly more distorted than those in squares or cages, yet are still SCO-active. Of the 127 complexes reviewed (79 published 2012-Feb. 2018), 54% are dinuclear, 10% trinuclear, 31% tetranuclear, and the remaining 5% are penta, hexa and octanuclear. Of the 93 designer ligands utilised in these polynuclear architectures: 60 feature azoles; 55 provide all donors to the Fe(ii) centres (no co-ligands coordinated) and form exclusively 5-membered chelate rings via either bidentate azole-imine/pyridine or tridentate heterocycle-imine/amine/thioether/pyridine-heterocycle binding pockets.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 192 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 23%
Student > Bachelor 20 10%
Researcher 18 9%
Student > Master 14 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 14 7%
Other 23 12%
Unknown 58 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 106 55%
Materials Science 7 4%
Physics and Astronomy 4 2%
Chemical Engineering 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 1%
Other 6 3%
Unknown 64 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2018.
All research outputs
#9,658,705
of 32,409,613 outputs
Outputs from Chemical Society Reviews
#2,365
of 5,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,026
of 482,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chemical Society Reviews
#129
of 267 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,409,613 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,126 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 482,427 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 267 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.