↓ Skip to main content

Effective diversity, equity, and inclusion practices

Overview of attention for article published in Healthcare Management Forum, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
240 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Effective diversity, equity, and inclusion practices
Published in
Healthcare Management Forum, August 2018
DOI 10.1177/0840470418773785
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gurwinder Kaur Gill, Mary Jane McNally, Vin Berman

Abstract

Demographics in Canada, and the workplace, are changing. These include population changes due to race, ethnicity, religion/faith, immigration status, gender, sexual identity and orientation, disability, income, educational background, socioeconomic status, and literacy. While this rich diversity can present challenges for patient experiences/outcomes and working environments, it can also present opportunities for positive transformation. For successful transformation to take place, strategies should focus on "Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion" (DEI) versus "diversity" alone and on creating inclusive team environments for positive staff experiences/engagement. There is a growing understanding of the relationship between the providers' work environments, patient outcomes, and organizational performance. This article leverages the principle of improving the healthcare provider's experience based on Health Quality Ontario's Quadruple Aim ("people caring for people"). Based on learnings/experiences, the top three successful practices from the organization's DEI strategy have been outlined in this article.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 240 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 240 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 8%
Student > Bachelor 18 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 5%
Lecturer 7 3%
Other 34 14%
Unknown 127 53%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 25 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 7%
Social Sciences 13 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 5%
Psychology 10 4%
Other 26 11%
Unknown 138 57%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2026.
All research outputs
#8,481,870
of 32,439,973 outputs
Outputs from Healthcare Management Forum
#112
of 459 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,937
of 343,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Healthcare Management Forum
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,439,973 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 459 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,245 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.