| Title |
Do clinicians understand the size of treatment effects? A randomized survey across 8 countries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Medical Association Journal, October 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1503/cmaj.150430 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bradley C. Johnston, Pablo Alonso-Coello, Jan O. Friedrich, Reem A. Mustafa, Kari A.O. Tikkinen, Ignacio Neumann, Per O. Vandvik, Elie A. Akl, Bruno R. da Costa, Neill K. Adhikari, Gemma Mas Dalmau, Elise Kosunen, Jukka Mustonen, Mark W. Crawford, Lehana Thabane, Gordon H. Guyatt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 280 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 53 | 19% |
| United States | 34 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 29 | 10% |
| Japan | 9 | 3% |
| Mexico | 5 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 5 | 2% |
| Argentina | 5 | 2% |
| Finland | 4 | 1% |
| Italy | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 34 | 12% |
| Unknown | 98 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 159 | 57% |
| Scientists | 71 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 41 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 8 | 3% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 103 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 11% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Researcher | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 10% |
| Other | 31 | 28% |
| Unknown | 23 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 6% |
| Psychology | 5 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 31 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 182. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2024.
All research outputs
#224,021
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#402
of 9,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,046
of 297,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#5
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,534 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,224 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.