↓ Skip to main content

Clinical and Echocardiographic Impact of Tafazzin Variants on Dilated Cardiomyopathy Phenotype in Left Ventricular Non-Compaction Patients in Early Infancy

Overview of attention for article published in Circulation Journal, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical and Echocardiographic Impact of Tafazzin Variants on Dilated Cardiomyopathy Phenotype in Left Ventricular Non-Compaction Patients in Early Infancy
Published in
Circulation Journal, August 2018
DOI 10.1253/circj.cj-18-0470
Pubmed ID
Authors

Keiichi Hirono, Yukiko Hata, Makoto Nakazawa, Nobuo Momoi, Tohru Tsuji, Taro Matsuoka, Mamoru Ayusawa, Yuriko Abe, Tamaki Hayashi, Nobuyuki Tsujii, Tadaaki Abe, Heima Sakaguchi, Ce Wang, Asami Takasaki, Shinya Takarada, Mako Okabe, Nariaki Miyao, Hideyuki Nakaoka, Keijiro Ibuki, Kazuyoshi Saito, Sayaka Ozawa, Naoki Nishida, Neil E Bowles, Fukiko Ichida

Abstract

Left ventricular non-compaction (LVNC) is a cardiomyopathy morphologically characterized by 2-layered myocardium and numerous prominent trabeculations, and is often associated with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). Variants in the gene encoding tafazzin (TAZ) may change mitochondrial function and cause dysfunction of many organs, but they also contribute to the DCM phenotype in LVNC, and the clinical and echocardiographic features of children with this phenotype are poorly understood. Methods and Results: We enrolled 92 DCM phenotype LVNC patients and performed next-generation sequencing to identify the genetic etiology. Ten TAZ variants were identified in 15 male patients (16.3%) of the 92 patients, including 3 novel missense substitutions. The patients with TAZ variants had a higher frequency of early onset of disease (92.3% vs. 62.3%, P=0.0182), positive family history (73.3% vs. 20.8%, P=0.0001), and higher LV posterior wall thickness Z-score (8.55±2.60 vs. 5.81±2.56, P=0.0103) than those without TAZ variants, although the mortality of both groups was similar. This study provides new insight into the impact of DCM phenotype LVNC and emphasizes the clinical advantages available for LVNC patients with TAZ variants.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 12%
Student > Postgraduate 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 4 16%
Unknown 10 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 12%
Psychology 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Unknown 11 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2018.
All research outputs
#17,292,294
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Circulation Journal
#1,448
of 2,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,433
of 341,495 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation Journal
#21
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,495 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.