↓ Skip to main content

Does the stress‐gradient hypothesis hold water? Disentangling spatial and temporal variation in plant effects on soil moisture in dryland systems

Overview of attention for article published in Functional Ecology, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Does the stress‐gradient hypothesis hold water? Disentangling spatial and temporal variation in plant effects on soil moisture in dryland systems
Published in
Functional Ecology, November 2015
DOI 10.1111/1365-2435.12592
Authors

Bradley J. Butterfield, John B. Bradford, Cristina Armas, Ivan Prieto, Francisco I. Pugnaire

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 162 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 23%
Researcher 35 21%
Student > Master 29 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 9%
Student > Bachelor 10 6%
Other 25 15%
Unknown 16 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 73 43%
Environmental Science 50 30%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 <1%
Computer Science 1 <1%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 29 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2016.
All research outputs
#15,349,419
of 22,831,537 outputs
Outputs from Functional Ecology
#2,022
of 2,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#226,591
of 386,677 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Functional Ecology
#31
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,831,537 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 386,677 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.