↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of the pulse shape discrimination performance of plastic scintillators coupled to a SiPM

Overview of attention for article published in Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research Section A, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Comparison of the pulse shape discrimination performance of plastic scintillators coupled to a SiPM
Published in
Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research Section A, November 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.nima.2018.08.054
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 26%
Researcher 8 21%
Student > Master 6 15%
Professor 2 5%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 11 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 12 31%
Engineering 7 18%
Unspecified 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Energy 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 15 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2018.
All research outputs
#24,116,787
of 34,400,738 outputs
Outputs from Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research Section A
#5,803
of 10,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#264,338
of 394,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research Section A
#66
of 240 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,400,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,721 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,890 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 240 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.