↓ Skip to main content

Poverty matters: Cannabis use among people with serious mental illness: Findings from the United States survey on drug use and health, 2015

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Social Psychiatry, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Poverty matters: Cannabis use among people with serious mental illness: Findings from the United States survey on drug use and health, 2015
Published in
International Journal of Social Psychiatry, August 2018
DOI 10.1177/0020764018795213
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Little is known about the influence of contextual characteristics on comorbid substance use and serious mental illness (SMI). To explore the role of poverty on comorbid SMI and cannabis use. We used data from the 2015 National Survey on Drug Use and Health, considering those in poverty, with income under 100% of the US poverty threshold. People in poverty were more likely to suffer from concurrent SMI and cannabis use (3.07%, 95% confidence interval (CI):1.84%; 5.07%), even controlling for gender, age, tobacco and alcohol use (odds ratio (OR) = 2.77, 95% CI: 1.27; 6.03, p = .010). The magnitude of the association between SMI and cannabis use is influenced by poverty status. More research on potential mediators like income inequality and impoverished social capital is needed.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Researcher 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Student > Master 4 8%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 17 34%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 9 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 16%
Social Sciences 6 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 18 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2024.
All research outputs
#21,559,723
of 32,304,778 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Social Psychiatry
#1,055
of 1,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,803
of 361,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Social Psychiatry
#7
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,304,778 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,586 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,975 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.