↓ Skip to main content

Impact of food consumption habits on the pesticide dietary intake: Comparison between a French vegetarian and the general population

Overview of attention for article published in Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#35 of 1,400)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
3 Redditors
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Impact of food consumption habits on the pesticide dietary intake: Comparison between a French vegetarian and the general population
Published in
Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A, October 2009
DOI 10.1080/02652030903031171
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marieke Van Audenhaege, Fanny Héraud, Céline Menard, Juliette Bouyrie, Sophie Morois, Gloria Calamassi-Tran, Sébastien Lesterle, Jean-Luc Volatier, Jean-Charles Leblanc

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Canada 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 66 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 16%
Student > Master 11 16%
Researcher 9 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Other 3 4%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 21 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 6%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 24 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,085,933
of 34,451,315 outputs
Outputs from Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A
#35
of 1,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,761
of 149,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,451,315 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,400 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 149,362 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.