↓ Skip to main content

A systematic review of integrated working between care homes and health care services

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
4 policy sources
twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
241 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A systematic review of integrated working between care homes and health care services
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, November 2011
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-11-320
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

In the UK there are almost three times as many beds in care homes as in National Health Service (NHS) hospitals. Care homes rely on primary health care for access to medical care and specialist services. Repeated policy documents and government reviews register concern about how health care works with independent providers, and the need to increase the equity, continuity and quality of medical care for care homes. Despite multiple initiatives, it is not known if some approaches to service delivery are more effective in promoting integrated working between the NHS and care homes. This study aims to evaluate the different integrated approaches to health care services supporting older people in care homes, and identify barriers and facilitators to integrated working.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 241 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Italy 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 231 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 44 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 13%
Student > Master 27 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 6%
Student > Bachelor 14 6%
Other 53 22%
Unknown 58 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 36 15%
Social Sciences 26 11%
Psychology 10 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 9 4%
Other 41 17%
Unknown 66 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,843,517
of 29,638,888 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#1,206
of 9,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,174
of 264,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#7
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,638,888 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,736 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,962 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.