Alcohol use and burden for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016

@bbcbrasil O tanto que beber ocasionalmente pode ser perigoso... https://t.co/fkQljNrbOS https://t.co/uvPGvJqmWP https://t.co/fVso6sfpRN https://t.co/1dr3ogEyaY

@maikpi70 Nur beim Thema Alkohol (Ende d. Videos) sehe ich es anders, auch d. vielen zs. Kalorien. https://t.co/1z8zQZzGLm https://t.co/D4nzpWKgq8 https://t.co/L0oMcqZjLj https://t.co/OZnr17b35z https://t.co/ffPsNFhwMz https://t.co/PUnRzMB0H5 https://t.…

@kfshinozuka Especially the 0 to 1 is a very small increment. https://t.co/Neb2Bj2hts https://t.co/lrLXLvIUYz

世界195カ国・592の研究を統合した、アルコールと健康の超大規模な見積もり健康全体の害がいちばん小さくなる飲酒量は「0杯」で、安全な量は見つからなかった特に15〜49歳は、飲酒リスク最大 https://t.co/HHi0qO0Rac

RT @fscarfe: Alcohol use and burden for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease St…

Alcohol use and burden for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016 - The Lancet https://t.co/XwSRbLIK82

@VeysiCe Nihayet yayınlandı derken? Zaten çok sayıda çalışma var son 30 yıldır konuyla ilgili. Bunların en bilinenlerinden biri de 2016 yılında Lancet dergisinde yayınlanan çalışmadır. https://t.co/llm3oolE49

La première, de 2018, conclut que les risques pour la santé liés à l'alcool apparaissent dès que l'on en consomme, donc sans effet protecteur à faible dose. Elle fait encore référence, bien que la seconde, qui la prolonge, se montre beaucoup plus mesurée…

@zazenboyszazen @realADHD_ この短時間で2つの異なる文章書いてるの怖すぎるんでやめてください。アルコール中毒にでもなったんですか？とにかく、最近の科学で「お酒は少量だと身体にいい」という説は完全否定されましたので自分の身を案じてください。 https://t.co/bMr8…

残念ながら両論ではなくて、｢アルコールは1滴も飲まないのが1番良い｣なんですよね https://t.co/QiCnXBW1MD ↑ 諸々補正すると、全体的な健康リスクを最小化する飲酒レベルは 0 が良いという報告まあでも、人間は不合理な行動をする生き物なので、飲酒もいいと思う https:/…

@PythonCEstLaVie @5D_Caster Franchement, j'aime bien la bière et j'en bois une de temps en temps, mais toutes les études qui existent sur le sujet tendent à prouver l'inverse : WHO (https://t.co/RFSl5VNOok) SPF (https://t.co/onVjqmXLx6) Étude The Lancet …

@MatCMeier Bier 🍺 ist ungesund! https://t.co/oSgPa39Ahe

RT @orinowit: Spożycie #alkohol i obciążenie nim w 195 krajach i terytoriach w latach 1990–2016: analiza systematyczna na potrzeby badania…

RT @MichaelStockli: @MatCMeier 1. World Heart Federation (2022) The Impact of Alcohol Consumption on Cardiovascular Health: Myths and Measu…

1. World Heart Federation (2022) The Impact of Alcohol Consumption on Cardiovascular Health: Myths and Measures Offizieller Report (PDF): https://t.co/hxesQgLWyL Wissenschaftliche Publikation dazu (Global Heart Journal): https://t.co/IK0dLomNfs 2. JAMA …

Funding Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Alkoholkonsum und damit verbundene Belastung in 195 Ländern und Gebieten, 1990–2016 https://t.co/zvHLs0IBk1

Alcohol use and burden for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016 - The Lancet. Here’s the article that changed the World’s perception of the safety of booze; the only safe level is ZERO…

@RusLegat @softwarevlogger Вот иследования опровергающие распостранённый миф про пользу в малых количествах https://t.co/OnRzCJWtSa https://t.co/OQISDTBsB5

@EnBastes @ExAvocatine Cadeau 🙃 https://t.co/R1aniymbVY

@stamina6505 残念ながら… https://t.co/owjaeQg21F

OK, je comprends, on ne parle pas du même article. Ta citation provient de https://t.co/KjaLF9vVne article à charge contre l'alcool se livrant à des extrapolations discutables. Celui dont je parle, plus neutre, est ici https://t.co/hpsEGO23b8 ses annexes…

Alcohol use and burden for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016 - The Lancet. This is a great article; it motivated me to advocate for ALCOHOL- FREE LIVING, Zero EtOH, NO BENEFITS! ht…

@jferWI The evidence of alcohol *harm* has been mounting: https://t.co/1U0QK3EDd4

RT @Epigene_Rejuven: https://t.co/3bDZOnksGu

@theia_Orphe https://t.co/XEMQQQeY2z

RT @orinowit: Spożycie #alkohol i obciążenie nim w 195 krajach i terytoriach w latach 1990–2016: analiza systematyczna na potrzeby badania…

Spożycie #alkohol i obciążenie nim w 195 krajach i terytoriach w latach 1990–2016: analiza systematyczna na potrzeby badania Global Burden of Disease Study 2016... #Lancet #orinowliber https://t.co/doWlMrK5Cg

RT @StonerchefPL: @Matty15726203 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 https://t.co/rQBANBEAs9 to na zdrowie z tą trucizną

@DrKissler Der "J-Shape" in der Assoziation von Alkoholkosum zu Mortalität ist ein Problem von Bias und Confounding. Weil die "Abstinenzler" in den Studien eine sehr heterogene Gruppe sind. https://t.co/PamTPxsby4 https://t.co/t7zDIL7y44 https://t.co/wyrD…

@linamariagarri1 @petrogustavo Una lista de estudios de cómo esto es una política de salud pública: https://t.co/BUxwRRu7TH https://t.co/7eGJFyHjE3 https://t.co/C92lCDwnvr

@PeteyBourgeois @_StonersRUs_ Here you have an article not from WHO. Note that you are still trying to deny the facts. Just admit that you are an alcoholic who tells yourself that being an alcoholic is not so bad https://t.co/fyr9RgpzLZ

@Matty15726203 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 https://t.co/rQBANBEAs9 to na zdrowie z tą trucizną

Alcohol use and burden for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016 - The Lancet. Two facts: 1)- the only safe level of alcohol is ZERO DRINKS/WK; 2)- NO HEALTH BENEFITS. Live ALCOHOL FREE…

Konzumace alkoholu a zátěž s ním spojená ve 195 zemích a teritoriích, 1990–2016: systematická analýza pro studii Global Burden of Disease Study 2016 - The Lancet https://t.co/bueD2woTd9

@jack__sparrow5 Patologiczne to sa gazety z takimi click bejtami. A jeszcze gorsi influencerzy wiedząc ze to kontrowersja i będę pisać ludzie komentarze. Tak alkohol trucizna Sa badania ze nawet niewielka ilość u niektórych może spowodować raka. Źródło T…

2018年Lancet8月誌のものですね。「195の国と地域で23のリスクを検証した結果、健康への悪影響を最小化するなら飲酒量はゼロがいい」と結論づけている。適度な飲酒は身体に良いと言われていた時代はここから終わりを告げましたね。 https://t.co/JItkA9lBmk

「最も安全な飲酒量はゼロ」 https://t.co/0NxzYccHSS https://t.co/kTGiX3Vu4n

RT @Epigene_Rejuven: https://t.co/3bDZOnksGu

https://t.co/3bDZOnksGu

Alcohol use and burden for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016 - The Lancet. This 26 year Worldwide study found that the only safe level of alcohol for optimal health is ZERO A WEEK! …

Alcohol use and burden for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016 - The Lancet. Seminal article makes 2 points: #1)-The only safe level? 0 a week; #2)- No benefit! LIVE ALCOHOL FREE. htt…

Alcohol use and burden for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016 - The Lancet. This is vital: the only safe level of alcohol use for optimal health is ZERO A WEEK! There are 0 benefits!…

@bartek79701 @KarolDzonson Proszę bardzo: https://t.co/WkxP79dccU

@bryan_johnson Me adding citations. Take note: https://t.co/j0VGqMryek

@DrSiyabMD Source: https://t.co/B95mco6ySS For overall mortality, there's essentially no difference between 0 and 1 drink per day. Most of the harm of alcohol at that level comes from tuberculosis risk (varies substantially by country).

@redisalive1917 Non, ces données sont fallacieuses. https://t.co/eRmn0Bmq4G https://t.co/0e3jBC9ZWA https://t.co/EgIy49Gl8p

Alcohol use and burden for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016 - The Lancet. This paper proves that the only safe level of alcohol is ZERO A WEEK AND THERE ARE NO HEALTH BENEFITS! ht…

@DrEiiiid https://t.co/ULCsJACfqn

RT @_ktomoya: 残念ながら、飲酒の健康効果は現代においてすべて否定されています。リスクを受け入れて飲みましょう！ https://t.co/yG4P61A81y https://t.co/aeyhNv1XLA

大事！でも、精神も影響あるはずだから、精神が楽になる分の効果はあるかと思う！宗教的になるけどさ！ https://t.co/lZ2cVENfEC

残念ながら、飲酒の健康効果は現代においてすべて否定されています。リスクを受け入れて飲みましょう！ https://t.co/yG4P61A81y https://t.co/aeyhNv1XLA https://t.co/PMnBQ9TMLX

@Mr_dydez @nastyabarta1 Це не так Було ж дослідження в ланцеті про те що БУДЬЯКИЙ рівень алкоголю підвищує рівень смертності (Україна доречі на 4му місці) Тут вижимка https://t.co/fX5LeXDrdK Тут оригінал https://t.co/urpBFCagF8

@dJa90412 @MHadrons @AbdoulayeK3 Non. https://t.co/MXkcXW3QRS

@dJa90412 @MHadrons @AbdoulayeK3 The Lancet, c'est ça ta source fiable ? Tiens ça démontre tout le contraire et c'est pourtant la même revue. https://t.co/MXkcXW3QRS

@LeskiPiotr @promptowy 26 lat badań w prawie 200 krajach https://t.co/Zu2nCDXNG5

肺癌riskのオッズ比は,非喫煙者に比べ,タバコの煙を吸い込む喫煙経験者で3.28(95％CI：2.38～4.53)https://t.co/VSOfGo6EfU アルコールの摂取は,世界中で疾病負担の主な危険因子で,15~49歳の人口における世界の死亡原因の約10％を占めるhttps://t.co/VCtelMIXeu

RT @Z5784Beno: @ALeaument @MLP_officiel Non seulement l'alcool est une drogue, à savoir une substance psychoactive avec effet de dépendance…

悔しいけれど、「酒は百薬の長」は既に否定されました…。 https://t.co/uv8KRqWbyF ですが、人生に1×即失格ルールはありません。多少の×は積みつつも、楽しむという〇を重ねていきましょう（ただし主治医に禁酒を言い渡されたらアウト）。 https://t.co/6QaWbQJOwm

@Silenciraptor @mieszko_j https://t.co/DcJ0Tz5aKw

Fact check: FALSE Even low levels of alcohol consumption increase the risk of various health outcomes, including cancer, cardiovascular diseases, and all-cause mortality https://t.co/6fGHO4bJyR https://t.co/rsOs0QmJdq

@ChrisMasterjohn Fact check: FALSE Even low levels of alcohol consumption increase the risk of various health outcomes, including cancer, cardiovascular diseases, and all-cause mortality https://t.co/6fGHO4bJyR

RT @PavelDusek: @pitvalka Celosvětově 7. nejčetnější rizikový faktor úmrtí. Ve věkové skupine 15–49 let mezi rizikovými faktory úmrtí úplný…

@Hermitual @JManthrow @TheLynx_1 @ObtainerOf Took less than 5 minutes to find a more comprehensive study that shows the opposite https://t.co/zoQjKr8PBi

RT @heroininheavens: 「アルコールはタバコほど有害ではない」「少量の飲酒なら安全」「酒は百薬の長」全部嘘 Alcohol use and burden for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2016: a…

@sydney_ev Citation from Lancet: https://t.co/H51DnFFSKL

@DonSoloway @TxJollyRoger @Christo48325726 @manlygumdrop @kylegriffin1 Google is free. The article mentioned the lead author, you shouldn’t need to ask for an article whose findings you couldn’t interpret, being you couldn’t even find it with all the giv…

@abcnews - The lancet has shown that there are no safe levels of alcohol. This would be relevant to mention in the 730 report. https://t.co/dfDvRmIJQx

Alcohol use and burden for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016 https://t.co/gH9hXI5PIQ

@zdenekschwarz1 @DVTVcz Existuje tohle a tam o tom nic takoveho neoíšou. https://t.co/lxdxSgLsfB

I don't trust #WHO #wef #billgates or #TheLancet https://t.co/Ilnpdzl304 https://t.co/IR02Q1OshA

@CerfiaFR https://t.co/gvD3glJKr0 « the level of consumption that minimises health loss is ZERO. »

@nntaleb AS @nntaleb points out, the risk are small for 1-2 drin ks/day. The figure shows Weighted relative risk of alcohol for all attributable causes, by standard drinks consumed per day. Source: https://t.co/6NM9NreuWv https://t.co/M1IKCDBMyp

@sophia_syoukaki 数年前のランセットのシステマティックレビューで発表されていましたが、飲酒を全くしない人が1番長生きで、飲酒による他の病気のリスク増加が大きいそうです。現状はゼロが良いそうで、百薬の長では無くなってきてるようですが、また新しい論文が出ると変…

ANY amount of #alcohol is harmful‼️ EBM is clear , and suggesting, as it is still in the 2021 @escardio prevention guidelines that low to moderate alcohol consumption is acceptable (

@18kSate @Jairzinhho @PessiMi98726687 @Lucchretienfoot @Fermininhoo https://t.co/gvD3glJKr0 https://t.co/BrL6SP5Xoo

余談「酒は百薬の長」と言われてきましたしかし最近の研究では、「基本的に飲酒量はゼロがいい」と結論付けられていますまあ健康の事だけを考えればそうかも知れないが、健康を追い求めるためだけに生きているわけではない https://t.co/qwqWrgnY3y

RT @FarEastJP: @VietNewsGateway @PhilstarNews @phnompenhpost @Thenationth Có thể #rượu cũng sẽ bị cấm. Tal vez también se prohíba el alco…

@VietNewsGateway @PhilstarNews @phnompenhpost @Thenationth Có thể #rượu cũng sẽ bị cấm. Tal vez también se prohíba el alcohol. Maybe #alcohol will be banned too. #TeX: C_{2}H_{6}O https://t.co/DNQpJY1b82 https://t.co/0ySxAliaN5

@Kubalongozny @PolskiKociarz @pawilon21 Proszę uprzejmie, dwa przeglądy i metaanalizy 694 baz i 87 badań, które łącznie pokazują, że każda dawka alkoholu szkodzi, wraz z wyjaśnieniem, jak zły dobór prób w ogóle doprowadził do wyników z dobrymi skutkami al…

@GeRoQu77 @Chm1elka @wojcis @Bartolomeoz37 @pawilon21 Ta hipoteza padła. Analiza ryzyka wskazuje, że alkohol zawsze czyni znacznie więcej szkód niż pożytku https://t.co/uiOWRoNpOG Dobre skutki wychodziły dlatego, że w badaniach za abstynentów brano ludz…

@FiendInno @letsgoUW @ClickingSeason @roguestunts404 @jmhorp You should probably link an actual study. https://t.co/4qIUM1k8Ix "We found that the risk of all-cause mortality, and of cancers specifically, rises with increasing levels of consumption, and…

@IHJWAMH @recceinv @unusual_whales This has been debunked. “the level of consumption that minimises health loss is zero” https://t.co/X0R55HxJFT

@chiragbarjatyaa Smoking and alcohol both kill. There's no safe level of either. Hookah isn't a safer alternative; it's as harmful or even worse than cigarettes. See these studies: Alcohol risks (The Lancet): https://t.co/ZFpqhbjMim Hookah dangers (CDC)…

@LnAmbassador @Karl_Lauterbach Die WHO (eigene Studie), die Stiftung Gesundheit, die Deutsche Weinakademie und die Deutsche Gesellschaft für Ernährung sagen das Gegenteil. Es gibt keinen risikofreien Konsum von Alkohol. Sehr plausible Studie dazu: http…

این همه توی آهنگا و توییتام میگم الکل بده آقا بده؛ این رپرای هیچی ندار رو ول کنین که ترویج می‌کنن خودتون بخونین https://t.co/v2hlyOOewv

@leah_pierson This was GBD 2016 (https://t.co/zlA30aNZvg). That was my (very weak) sense as well based on the mendelian lit, though I'm certainly not an expert

RT @1059kanri: @summernight114 こちらですねー https://t.co/jYsdADFAKX

RT @1059kanri: @hikagminC 基本的にはこちらの論文ですかねー https://t.co/jYsdADFAKX

RT @1059kanri: @summernight114 こちらですねー https://t.co/jYsdADFAKX

RT @1059kanri: @hikagminC 基本的にはこちらの論文ですかねー https://t.co/jYsdADFAKX

https://t.co/NFkB3pSLfJ

@summernight114 こちらですねー https://t.co/jYsdADFAKX

RT @1059kanri: @hikagminC 基本的にはこちらの論文ですかねー https://t.co/jYsdADFAKX

@hikagminC 基本的にはこちらの論文ですかねー https://t.co/jYsdADFAKX

Alcohol use and burden for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016

About this Attention Score

Mentioned by

Readers on