↓ Skip to main content

Mutation (variation) databases and registries: a rationale for coordination of efforts

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Reviews Genetics, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Mutation (variation) databases and registries: a rationale for coordination of efforts
Published in
Nature Reviews Genetics, October 2011
DOI 10.1038/nrg3011-c1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 6%
Spain 2 6%
Tunisia 1 3%
Sweden 1 3%
Germany 1 3%
Belgium 1 3%
Unknown 24 75%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 28%
Researcher 8 25%
Other 4 13%
Professor 3 9%
Student > Master 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 4 13%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 59%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Mathematics 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2011.
All research outputs
#20,152,153
of 22,659,164 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Genetics
#2,531
of 2,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,796
of 140,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Genetics
#47
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,659,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,578 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 140,380 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.