↓ Skip to main content

Testing Women for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection: Who, When, and How?

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology, September 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Testing Women for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection: Who, When, and How?
Published in
Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology, September 2008
DOI 10.1097/grf.0b013e3181809263
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Obstetrician-gynecologists provide comprehensive primary and preventive care for women and are ideally suited to provide human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) screening for their patients. This paper provides a summary and rationale for the current recommendations for HIV testing among women in the United States, emphasizing recommendations from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists [corrected] Who should receive HIV testing, when and how often testing should be conducted, and how testing should be offered are discussed. These recommendations are described separately for general populations (including nonpregnant women) and for pregnant women and their infants.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Australia 1 4%
Unknown 25 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 3 12%
Researcher 3 12%
Librarian 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 4%
Other 6 23%
Unknown 9 35%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 58%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Unknown 9 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2011.
All research outputs
#27,728,317
of 34,362,729 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology
#1,352
of 1,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,086
of 134,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology
#8
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,362,729 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,941 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 134,977 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.