↓ Skip to main content

Oocyte-Specific Differences in Cell-Cycle Control Create an Innate Susceptibility to Meiotic Errors

Overview of attention for article published in Current Biology, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Oocyte-Specific Differences in Cell-Cycle Control Create an Innate Susceptibility to Meiotic Errors
Published in
Current Biology, April 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2011.03.003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 119 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 23%
Researcher 26 21%
Student > Master 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Student > Bachelor 8 6%
Other 21 17%
Unknown 20 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 38 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 7%
Chemistry 3 2%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 21 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2011.
All research outputs
#17,932,284
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Current Biology
#12,733
of 14,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,744
of 125,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Biology
#67
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,876 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 62.2. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,237 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.