↓ Skip to main content

What agricultural practices are most likely to deliver “sustainable intensification” in the UK?

Overview of attention for article published in Food and Energy Security, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#33 of 356)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
33 X users

Readers on

mendeley
289 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
What agricultural practices are most likely to deliver “sustainable intensification” in the UK?
Published in
Food and Energy Security, October 2018
DOI 10.1002/fes3.148
Authors

Lynn V. Dicks, David C. Rose, Frederic Ang, Stephen Aston, A. Nicholas E. Birch, Nigel Boatman, Elizabeth L. Bowles, David Chadwick, Alex Dinsdale, Sam Durham, John Elliott, Les Firbank, Stephen Humphreys, Phil Jarvis, Dewi Jones, Daniel Kindred, Stuart M. Knight, Michael R. F. Lee, Carlo Leifert, Matt Lobley, Kim Matthews, Alice Midmer, Mark Moore, Carol Morris, Simon Mortimer, T. Charles Murray, Keith Norman, Stephen Ramsden, Dave Roberts, Laurence G. Smith, Richard Soffe, Chris Stoate, Bryony Taylor, David Tinker, Mark Topliff, John Wallace, Prysor Williams, Paul Wilson, Michael Winter, William J. Sutherland

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 289 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 289 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 13%
Student > Master 34 12%
Researcher 32 11%
Student > Bachelor 23 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 7%
Other 48 17%
Unknown 94 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 75 26%
Environmental Science 27 9%
Engineering 18 6%
Social Sciences 16 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 12 4%
Other 34 12%
Unknown 107 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,727,881
of 34,286,807 outputs
Outputs from Food and Energy Security
#33
of 356 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,174
of 391,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Food and Energy Security
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,286,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 356 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 391,513 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.