↓ Skip to main content

Intravenous Vitamin C for Cancer Therapy – Identifying the Current Gaps in Our Knowledge

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
42 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
reddit
8 Redditors
video
1 YouTube creator
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
190 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Intravenous Vitamin C for Cancer Therapy – Identifying the Current Gaps in Our Knowledge
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, August 2018
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2018.01182
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 190 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 24 13%
Student > Master 24 13%
Researcher 19 10%
Other 12 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 6%
Other 30 16%
Unknown 69 36%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 4%
Other 21 11%
Unknown 75 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 94. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2026.
All research outputs
#565,904
of 34,267,958 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#335
of 18,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,331
of 373,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#9
of 482 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,267,958 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18,450 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,693 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 482 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.