↓ Skip to main content

Prevention of post operative complications following surgical treatment of equine colic: Current evidence

Overview of attention for article published in Equine Veterinary Journal, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
198 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Prevention of post operative complications following surgical treatment of equine colic: Current evidence
Published in
Equine Veterinary Journal, November 2015
DOI 10.1111/evj.12517
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Changes in management of the surgical colic patient over the last 30 years have resulted in considerable improvement in postoperative survival rates. However, postoperative complications remain common and these impact negatively on horse welfare, probability of survival, return to previous use and the costs of treatment. Multiple studies have investigated risk factors for postoperative complications following surgical management of colic and interventions that might be effective in reducing the likelihood of these occurring. The findings from these studies are frequently contradictory and the evidence for many interventions is lacking or inconclusive. This review discusses the current available evidence and identifies areas where further studies are necessary and factors that should be taken into consideration in study design. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 197 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 28 14%
Student > Bachelor 25 13%
Student > Master 20 10%
Student > Postgraduate 19 10%
Researcher 16 8%
Other 43 22%
Unknown 47 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 108 55%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 4%
Unspecified 3 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 46 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2016.
All research outputs
#8,720,568
of 28,086,468 outputs
Outputs from Equine Veterinary Journal
#546
of 2,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,993
of 300,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Equine Veterinary Journal
#7
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,086,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,317 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,105 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.