↓ Skip to main content

Genes and environment in neonatal intraventricular hemorrhage

Overview of attention for article published in Seminars in Perinatology, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Genes and environment in neonatal intraventricular hemorrhage
Published in
Seminars in Perinatology, October 2015
DOI 10.1053/j.semperi.2015.09.006
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Emerging data suggest intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) of the preterm neonate is a complex disorder with contributions from both the environment and the genome. Environmental analyses suggest factors mediating both cerebral blood flow and angiogenesis contribute to IVH, while candidate gene studies report variants in angiogenesis, inflammation, and vascular pathways. Gene-by-environment interactions demonstrate the interaction between the environment and the genome, and a non-replicated genome-wide association study suggests that both environmental and genetic factors contribute to the risk for severe IVH in very low-birth weight preterm neonates.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 110 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 17%
Student > Master 11 10%
Researcher 11 10%
Other 10 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 5%
Other 23 20%
Unknown 33 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 46 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2023.
All research outputs
#15,168,964
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Seminars in Perinatology
#544
of 887 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,720
of 295,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Seminars in Perinatology
#10
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 887 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,169 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.