↓ Skip to main content

Physiologic Breastfeeding: A Contemporary Approach to Breastfeeding Initiation

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
151 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Physiologic Breastfeeding: A Contemporary Approach to Breastfeeding Initiation
Published in
Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health, October 2015
DOI 10.1111/jmwh.12319
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Early initiation of breastfeeding has numerous benefits for maternal-child health. Maternity care providers have been shown to play a significant role in establishing breastfeeding, yet there is limited research about clinical approaches that support breastfeeding initiation in the immediate postpartum. Traditional methods that focused on position and attachment have not demonstrated consistent, positive effects on breastfeeding outcomes. Contemporary approaches to breastfeeding initiation emphasize innate maternal and neonatal breastfeeding abilities and the importance of breastfeeding self-efficacy, dyad-centered care, and a supportive breastfeeding environment free from unnecessary interventions. Recommendations for clinical practice for physiologic breastfeeding initiation are provided.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Mexico 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 149 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 16%
Student > Bachelor 22 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Other 8 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 5%
Other 28 19%
Unknown 51 34%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 54 36%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 14%
Social Sciences 7 5%
Psychology 5 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 1%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 52 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2015.
All research outputs
#17,452,242
of 27,293,837 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health
#896
of 1,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,910
of 293,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health
#5
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,293,837 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,372 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,052 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.