↓ Skip to main content

Incidence rate and predictors of permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with self-expanding CoreValve prosthesis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
patent
4 patents
guideline
2 clinical guideline sources

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Incidence rate and predictors of permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with self-expanding CoreValve prosthesis
Published in
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, November 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10840-011-9634-5
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Conduction disorders and permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation are common complications in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Previous studies, evaluating small populations, have identified several different predictors of PPM implantation after TAVI. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence rate of conduction disorders and the predictors of postoperative PPM requirement in a large series of patients undergoing TAVI.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 80 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 20%
Other 11 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Student > Master 5 6%
Other 17 21%
Unknown 18 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 67%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 22 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2026.
All research outputs
#3,712,915
of 33,934,236 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology
#205
of 2,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,335
of 301,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,934,236 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,207 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,978 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.