↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#29 of 123)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Complications and management of hyperkalemia: implications for the use of the novel cation exchangers zirconium cyclosilicate and patiromer
Published in
Clinical Investigation, December 2015
DOI 10.4155/cli.15.48
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Australia 1 7%
Unknown 13 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 3 21%
Student > Bachelor 2 14%
Researcher 2 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Professor 1 7%
Other 2 14%
Unknown 3 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 43%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Chemistry 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 3 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2019.
All research outputs
#8,854,664
of 26,924,559 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Investigation
#29
of 123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,603
of 399,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Investigation
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,924,559 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,405 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them