↓ Skip to main content

Exposure of native bees foraging in an agricultural landscape to current-use pesticides

Overview of attention for article published in Science of the Total Environment, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
21 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
168 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
416 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exposure of native bees foraging in an agricultural landscape to current-use pesticides
Published in
Science of the Total Environment, November 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.10.077
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michelle L. Hladik, Mark Vandever, Kelly L. Smalling

Abstract

The awareness of insects as pollinators and indicators of environmental quality has grown in recent years, partially in response to declines in honey bee (Apis mellifera) populations. While most pesticide research has focused on honey bees, there has been less work on native bee populations. To determine the exposure of native bees to pesticides, bees were collected from an existing research area in northeastern Colorado in both grasslands (2013-2014) and wheat fields (2014). Traps were deployed bi-monthly during the summer at each land cover type and all bees, regardless of species, were composited as whole samples and analyzed for 136 current-use pesticides and degradates. This reconnaissance approach provides a sampling of all species and represents overall pesticide exposure (internal and external). Nineteen pesticides and degradates were detected in 54 composite samples collected. Compounds detected in >2% of the samples included: insecticides thiamethoxam (46%), bifenthrin (28%), clothianidin (24%), chlorpyrifos (17%), imidacloprid (13%), fipronil desulfinyl (7%; degradate); fungicides azoxystrobin (17%), pyraclostrobin (11%), fluxapyroxad (9%), and propiconazole (9%); herbicides atrazine (19%) and metolachlor (9%). Concentrations ranged from 1 to 310ng/g for individual pesticides. Pesticides were detected in samples collected from both grasslands and wheat fields; the location of the sample and the surrounding land cover at the 1000m radius influenced the pesticides detected but because of a small number of temporally comparable samples, correlations between pesticide concentration and land cover were not significant. The results show native bees collected in an agricultural landscape are exposed to multiple pesticides, these results can direct future research on routes/timing of pesticide exposure and the design of future conservation efforts for pollinators.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 416 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Poland 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 409 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 68 16%
Student > Bachelor 58 14%
Researcher 57 14%
Student > Master 57 14%
Professor 22 5%
Other 75 18%
Unknown 79 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 197 47%
Environmental Science 57 14%
Chemistry 10 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 2%
Engineering 9 2%
Other 40 10%
Unknown 94 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2016.
All research outputs
#1,241,953
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Science of the Total Environment
#1,674
of 29,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,564
of 296,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science of the Total Environment
#8
of 244 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,655 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,508 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 244 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.