↓ Skip to main content

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: effects on plant terpenoid accumulation

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Biology, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: effects on plant terpenoid accumulation
Published in
Plant Biology, November 2015
DOI 10.1111/plb.12408
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) are a diverse group of soil dwelling fungi that form symbiotic associations with land plants. AMF-plant associations promote the accumulation of plant terpenoids beneficial to human health, although how AMF mediate terpenoid accumulation is not fully understood. A critical assessment and discussion of the literature relating to mechanisms by which AMF influence plant terpenoid accumulation, and whether this symbiosis can be harnessed in horticultural ecosystems was performed. Modification of plant morphology, phosphorus availability, and gene transcription involved with terpenoid biosynthetic pathways were identified as key mechanisms associated with terpenoid accumulation in AMF-colonised plants. In order to exploit AMF-plant symbioses in horticultural ecosystems it is important to consider the specificity of the AMF-plant association, the predominant factor affecting terpenoid accumulation, as well as the end-use application of the harvested plant material. Future research should focus on resolving the relationship between ecologically-matched AMF genotypes and terpenoid accumulation in plants to establish if these associations are effective at promoting mechanisms favourable for plant terpenoid accumulation. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 11%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 12 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 9%
Environmental Science 4 7%
Chemistry 4 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 15 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2022.
All research outputs
#14,632,413
of 24,542,484 outputs
Outputs from Plant Biology
#487
of 1,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,411
of 288,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Biology
#3
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,542,484 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,102 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,144 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.