↓ Skip to main content

The Foundations of Literacy Development in Children at Familial Risk of Dyslexia

Overview of attention for article published in Psychological Science, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
93 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Readers on

mendeley
354 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Foundations of Literacy Development in Children at Familial Risk of Dyslexia
Published in
Psychological Science, November 2015
DOI 10.1177/0956797615603702
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The development of reading skills is underpinned by oral language abilities: Phonological skills appear to have a causal influence on the development of early word-level literacy skills, and reading-comprehension ability depends, in addition to word-level literacy skills, on broader (semantic and syntactic) language skills. Here, we report a longitudinal study of children at familial risk of dyslexia, children with preschool language difficulties, and typically developing control children. Preschool measures of oral language predicted phoneme awareness and grapheme-phoneme knowledge just before school entry, which in turn predicted word-level literacy skills shortly after school entry. Reading comprehension at 8½ years was predicted by word-level literacy skills at 5½ years and by language skills at 3½ years. These patterns of predictive relationships were similar in both typically developing children and those at risk of literacy difficulties. Our findings underline the importance of oral language skills for the development of both word-level literacy and reading comprehension.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 93 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 354 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 347 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 62 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 12%
Student > Bachelor 39 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 5%
Researcher 19 5%
Other 63 18%
Unknown 110 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 91 26%
Social Sciences 42 12%
Linguistics 24 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 5%
Neuroscience 11 3%
Other 46 13%
Unknown 123 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 73. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2021.
All research outputs
#738,098
of 34,248,450 outputs
Outputs from Psychological Science
#1,236
of 4,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,620
of 323,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychological Science
#23
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,248,450 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,560 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 86.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,716 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.