↓ Skip to main content

The physics of jamming for granular materials: a review

Overview of attention for article published in Reports on Progress in Physics, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
236 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The physics of jamming for granular materials: a review
Published in
Reports on Progress in Physics, November 2018
DOI 10.1088/1361-6633/aadc3c
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 236 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 236 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 18%
Researcher 28 12%
Student > Master 24 10%
Student > Bachelor 14 6%
Professor 9 4%
Other 29 12%
Unknown 89 38%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 50 21%
Physics and Astronomy 46 19%
Chemical Engineering 11 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 3%
Other 22 9%
Unknown 94 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2018.
All research outputs
#21,972,100
of 32,950,213 outputs
Outputs from Reports on Progress in Physics
#1,137
of 1,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#239,837
of 384,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reports on Progress in Physics
#17
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,950,213 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,369 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 384,092 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.