↓ Skip to main content

Tools and methods in participatory modeling: Selecting the right tool for the job

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Modelling & Software, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
31 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
270 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
604 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tools and methods in participatory modeling: Selecting the right tool for the job
Published in
Environmental Modelling & Software, November 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.08.028
Authors

Alexey Voinov, Karen Jenni, Steven Gray, Nagesh Kolagani, Pierre D. Glynn, Pierre Bommel, Christina Prell, Moira Zellner, Michael Paolisso, Rebecca Jordan, Eleanor Sterling, Laura Schmitt Olabisi, Philippe J. Giabbanelli, Zhanli Sun, Christophe Le Page, Sondoss Elsawah, Todd K. BenDor, Klaus Hubacek, Bethany K. Laursen, Antonie Jetter, Laura Basco-Carrera, Alison Singer, Laura Young, Jessica Brunacini, Alex Smajgl

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 604 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 604 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 116 19%
Researcher 85 14%
Student > Master 77 13%
Student > Bachelor 33 5%
Lecturer 25 4%
Other 96 16%
Unknown 172 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 87 14%
Engineering 53 9%
Social Sciences 51 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 45 7%
Computer Science 23 4%
Other 133 22%
Unknown 212 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,604,898
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Modelling & Software
#53
of 1,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,948
of 367,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Modelling & Software
#1
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,659 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,775 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.