↓ Skip to main content

The effect of race and socioeconomic status on outcomes following adrenal operations

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Surgical Oncology, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The effect of race and socioeconomic status on outcomes following adrenal operations
Published in
Journal of Surgical Oncology, November 2015
DOI 10.1002/jso.24082
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Disparities following different operations exist. We seek to measure the effects of race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status on outcomes following adrenal surgery. Cross-sectional analysis of adrenal operations identified in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2003 to 2009. A total of 7,537 procedures were included. Operations by high-volume surgeons had shorter length of stay (LOS) (3.4 days vs. 5.2 days, P < 0.001) and fewer complications (11.6% vs. 16.7%, P < 0.001). Hispanics were more likely to be operated on by low-volume surgeons [OR: 2.17, 95%CI: (1.33, 3.55)]. There were significant differences in LOS and cost among races/ethnicities, income categories, and insurance types (P < 0.05). Hispanics had longer LOS compared to Whites (P = 0.002) and their management was associated with a higher cost ($20,754.00 ± 1,478.40). Patients with either Medicaid [OR: 1.70, 95%CI: (1.30, 2.22)] or Medicare [OR: 1.86, 95%CI: (1.36, 2.54)] were more likely to have a LOS >5 days. Racial and socioeconomic disparities exist; however, they are not solely related to access. A complex interplay between various racial, cultural, and socioeconomic factors likely influence outcomes in adrenal surgery. J. Surg. Oncol. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 7 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Researcher 3 10%
Other 2 7%
Other 6 20%
Unknown 6 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 47%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 10 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2015.
All research outputs
#24,528,145
of 27,263,779 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Surgical Oncology
#615
of 774 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#257,575
of 298,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Surgical Oncology
#13
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,263,779 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 774 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,499 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.