↓ Skip to main content

Electric field gradients at 111In/111Cd probe atoms on A-sites in 211-MAX phases

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Electric field gradients at 111In/111Cd probe atoms on A-sites in 211-MAX phases
Published in
Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, November 2011
DOI 10.1088/0953-8984/23/50/505501
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The method of perturbed angular correlation (PAC) was applied to selected MAX phases with 211 stoichiometry. Radioactive (111)In ions were implanted in order to measure the electric field gradients (EFG) in the key compounds Ti(2)InC and Zr(2)InC to determine the strength and symmetry of the EFG at the In-site. Further PAC studies in the In-free MAX phases Ti(2)AlN, Nb(2)AlC, Nb(2)AsC and Cr(2)GeC were performed to confirm that the In probes occupy the A-site as well. The strength of the EFG, with a quadrupole coupling constant ν(Q) between 250 and 300 MHz in these phases, is quite similar to the ones found in Ti(2)InC with ν(Q) = 292(1) MHz and in Zr(2)InC with ν(Q) = 344(1) MHz, respectively. Different annealing behavior was observed whereas in all cases a linear decrease of ν(Q) with increasing measuring temperatures was found. The experimental results are also in excellent agreement with those predicted by ab initio calculations using the APW+lo method implemented in the WIEN2k code. This study shows in an exceptional manner that (111)In → (111)Cd atoms are suitable probes to investigate the local surrounding at the A-site in 211-MAX phases.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 6%
Unknown 15 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 50%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Professor 2 13%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 13%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 5 31%
Physics and Astronomy 3 19%
Chemistry 2 13%
Engineering 2 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 2 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2011.
All research outputs
#27,205,565
of 32,950,213 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter
#3,889
of 6,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#252,024
of 293,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter
#29
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,950,213 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,847 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,990 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.