The purpose of this controlled laboratory study was to determine the efficacy of Interleukin-1 Receptor Antagonist Protein (IRAP) treatment as an early intervention strategy by examining the changes in microRNA and mRNA expression in cartilage in an ex-vivo porcine knee joint impact model.
Custom impact device was used to create replicable injury ex-vivo to intact porcine knee joint. Injury was caused by dropping a 10 kg weight one time from 1 m directly above the knee in extension. One hour after impact 20 μg/ml IRAP solution was intra-articularly injected. At 8 h post-injury, cartilage samples were harvested for cell viability and genetic expression analysis. Genetic expression of miR-27b, miR-140, miR-125b, ADAMTS-4, ADAMTS-5, MMP-3, IL-1β, and TNF-α were analyzed by RT-PCR. Cell viability image analysis was performed using ImageJ software. Groups were compared by analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey's post-hoc test. A P-value <0.05 was considered significant.
At 8 h after IRAP treatment, expressions of ADAMTS-4, ADAMTS-5, MMP-3, IL-1β, and TNF-α in cartilage were significantly down-regulated from injury group (all P < 0.001). MiR-140, miR-125b, and miR-27b expressions were significantly up-regulated after treatment as compared to control and injury groups (all P < 0.001).
This study demonstrates that IRAP treatment administered during acute phase of cartilage impact injury increases expression levels of miR-140, miR-125b, and miR-27b in cartilage, indicating increased inhibition of their respective matrix-degrading enzymes. Clinically, these findings support the potential of IRAP treatment as an early intervention strategy for the prevention of cartilage degeneration after impact injury.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2015.
All research outputs
#16,366,412
of 25,836,587 outputs
Outputs from Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
#2,346
of 3,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,488
of 295,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
#34
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,836,587 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,167 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,807 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
