↓ Skip to main content

A Randomized Steady-State Bioavailability Study of Synthetic versus Natural (Kiwifruit-Derived) Vitamin C

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrients, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
4 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
4 Redditors
video
4 YouTube creators
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A Randomized Steady-State Bioavailability Study of Synthetic versus Natural (Kiwifruit-Derived) Vitamin C
Published in
Nutrients, September 2013
DOI 10.3390/nu5093684
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 102 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 20%
Researcher 13 12%
Student > Master 11 10%
Other 9 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 8%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 29 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 8%
Chemistry 3 3%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 36 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2026.
All research outputs
#2,135,101
of 33,037,692 outputs
Outputs from Nutrients
#6,462
of 27,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,210
of 237,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrients
#29
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,037,692 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 27,439 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,991 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.