↓ Skip to main content

Urinary excretion studies of meldonium after multidose parenteral application

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pharmaceutical & Biomedical Analysis, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Urinary excretion studies of meldonium after multidose parenteral application
Published in
Journal of Pharmaceutical & Biomedical Analysis, August 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.jpba.2018.08.053
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guro Forsdahl, Biljana Jančić-Stojanović, Marija Anđelković, Nenad Dikić, Tomas Geisendorfer, Veronika Jeitler, Günter Gmeiner

Abstract

Meldonium is a drug exhibiting cardioprotective and anti-ischemic effects. Due to its potential performance-enhancing benefit in sports, meldonium was added to the World Anti-Doping Agency list of prohibited substances in 2016. Since then, a high number of adverse analytical findings reported on meldonium has questioned meldonium`s detection time in urine. Hence, the objective of the current study was to characterize the pharmacokinetic urinary excretion pattern of meldonium when administered as multiple intravenous injections. Three injections of 250 mg meldonium were given over a time period of five days to six healthy volunteers and urine samples were collected for eight months after the last injection of the drug. For the quantification of meldonium in urine, a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method was fully validated according to the World Anti-Doping Agency guidelines in terms of specificity, matrix interferences, intra- and inter-day precision, accuracy, carry-over, robustness, linearity, limit of detection, and limit of quantification. The assay was successfully applied to the pharmacokinetic study. A three-compartment model was found to best describe the pharmacokinetics of meldonium with average alpha, beta, and gamma half-lives of 1.4 h, 9.4 h, and 655 h, respectively. The detection time in urine varied between 94 and 162 days.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 22%
Researcher 7 19%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Lecturer 2 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 5%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 11 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 13 35%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 8%
Sports and Recreations 3 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 11 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2018.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pharmaceutical & Biomedical Analysis
#3,421
of 4,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#301,280
of 344,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pharmaceutical & Biomedical Analysis
#59
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,798 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,178 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.