↓ Skip to main content

Nature as a Commodity: What's Good for Human Health Might Not Be Good for Ecosystem Health

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
13 X users

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Nature as a Commodity: What's Good for Human Health Might Not Be Good for Ecosystem Health
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, September 2018
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01673
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 108 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 19%
Student > Master 20 19%
Researcher 11 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Professor 4 4%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 34 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 15 14%
Psychology 11 10%
Social Sciences 10 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 6%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 46 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2020.
All research outputs
#1,963,503
of 31,889,638 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#4,080
of 40,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,085
of 364,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#101
of 742 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,889,638 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 40,675 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 742 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.