↓ Skip to main content

Within-category VOT affects recovery from “lexical” garden-paths: Evidence against phoneme-level inhibition

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Memory & Language, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
182 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Within-category VOT affects recovery from “lexical” garden-paths: Evidence against phoneme-level inhibition
Published in
Journal of Memory & Language, January 2009
DOI 10.1016/j.jml.2008.07.002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 12 7%
Vietnam 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Cyprus 1 <1%
Unknown 166 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 26%
Researcher 31 17%
Student > Master 21 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 18 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 31 17%
Unknown 22 12%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 61 34%
Linguistics 58 32%
Social Sciences 10 5%
Neuroscience 7 4%
Computer Science 3 2%
Other 14 8%
Unknown 29 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2015.
All research outputs
#31,183,241
of 34,360,889 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Memory & Language
#812
of 897 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#239,623
of 249,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Memory & Language
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,360,889 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 897 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,289 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.