↓ Skip to main content

Criteria for nap identification in infants and young children using 24-h actigraphy and agreement with parental diary

Overview of attention for article published in Sleep Medicine, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Criteria for nap identification in infants and young children using 24-h actigraphy and agreement with parental diary
Published in
Sleep Medicine, November 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.sleep.2015.10.013
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The study aimed to determine if an automated algorithm, capable of batch scoring, could extract naps and other 24-h sleep-wake variables from actigraphy without the need for parental sleep diaries, which rely heavily on parental awareness of child sleep. A cross-sectional design was used for the study. The study examined healthy infants/children in their home setting. A total of 160 infants/children in five age groups (6 months, and 1, 2, 3½ and 5 years) participated in the study. Participants wore actigraphs for 5-7 days, and parents completed sleep diaries over 2 consecutive days. Three criteria were applied to find the minimum sleep time (20, 30 and 40 min) yielding the best nap agreement between diaries and actigraphy for nap/no-nap identification. Best agreements were 72.1% (20 min minimum), 78.4% (20 min), 91.0% (30 min) and 93.3% (30 min) for ages 6 months, 1, 2 and 3½ years, respectively. Kappa statistics classified nap-nap agreement as 'slight' for 6-month data but 'moderate' or 'almost perfect' for older age groups. The number of daytime naps extracted at each age group yielded no significant discrepancies between the methods. Diaries generally returned significantly earlier sleep onset, later sleep offset, longer sleep duration and fewer night wakings at 6 months and 1 and 2 years, but this was not significant at 3½ or 5 years of age. Minimum age-specific sleep time thresholds are recommended to improve nap identification in actigraphy across infant and toddler age groups. The findings strengthen our confidence in the ability to collect actigraphy data in the absence of parental diaries, in 3½- and 5-year-olds, at least.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 91 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Student > Master 5 5%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 29 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 12 13%
Neuroscience 10 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 9%
Social Sciences 7 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 7%
Other 18 20%
Unknown 31 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2015.
All research outputs
#16,720,137
of 25,368,786 outputs
Outputs from Sleep Medicine
#2,297
of 3,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,429
of 294,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sleep Medicine
#43
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,368,786 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,713 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,331 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.