↓ Skip to main content

Performance Outcomes of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in the National Basketball Association

Overview of attention for article published in Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery, August 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
8 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
206 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Performance Outcomes of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in the National Basketball Association
Published in
Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery, August 2009
DOI 10.1016/j.arthro.2009.02.021
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the rate of return to play and to quantify the effect on the basketball player's performance after surgical reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL).

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 206 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Spain 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 198 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 28 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 13%
Student > Master 26 13%
Other 16 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 7%
Other 39 19%
Unknown 56 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 34%
Sports and Recreations 38 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Psychology 3 1%
Other 11 5%
Unknown 62 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2019.
All research outputs
#3,190,288
of 34,573,323 outputs
Outputs from Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery
#449
of 5,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,635
of 173,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,573,323 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,239 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,892 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.