↓ Skip to main content

Optimizing Functional Accuracy of TMS in Cognitive Studies: A Comparison of Methods

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, February 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
patent
2 patents
guideline
2 clinical guideline sources

Readers on

mendeley
504 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Optimizing Functional Accuracy of TMS in Cognitive Studies: A Comparison of Methods
Published in
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, February 2009
DOI 10.1162/jocn.2009.21126
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 504 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Italy 6 1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Canada 4 <1%
United States 3 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Other 6 1%
Unknown 471 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 120 24%
Researcher 92 18%
Student > Master 61 12%
Student > Bachelor 33 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 31 6%
Other 82 16%
Unknown 85 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 152 30%
Neuroscience 101 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 44 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 6%
Engineering 29 6%
Other 36 7%
Unknown 112 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2026.
All research outputs
#2,732,788
of 34,574,341 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
#307
of 2,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,253
of 252,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
#6
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,574,341 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,735 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,876 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.