↓ Skip to main content

Job Strain, Occupational Category, Systolic Blood Pressure, and Hypertension Prevalence

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Job Strain, Occupational Category, Systolic Blood Pressure, and Hypertension Prevalence
Published in
Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine, November 2015
DOI 10.1097/jom.0000000000000533
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To assess associations of occupational categories and job characteristics with prevalent hypertension. We analyzed 2517 Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis participants, working 20+ hours per week, in 2002 to 2004. Higher job decision latitude was associated with a lower prevalence of hypertension, prevalence ratio = 0.78 (95% confidence interval 0.66 to 0.91) for the top versus bottom quartile of job decision latitude. Associations, however, differed by occupation: decision latitude was associated with a higher prevalence of hypertension in health care support occupations (interaction P = 0.02). Occupation modified associations of sex with hypertension: a higher prevalence of hypertension in women (vs men) was observed in health care support and in blue-collar occupations (interaction P = 0.03). Lower job decision latitude is associated with hypertension prevalence in many occupations. Further research is needed to determine reasons for differential impact of decision latitude and sex on hypertension across occupations.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 77 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Student > Master 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Student > Postgraduate 6 8%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 35 45%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 10%
Social Sciences 6 8%
Psychology 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 36 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2020.
All research outputs
#11,547,306
of 34,560,573 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine
#2,519
of 6,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,175
of 320,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine
#27
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,560,573 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 65th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,234 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,999 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.