You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pattern-Reversal Visual Evoked Potential Parameters and Migraine in the Teenage Population
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Child Neurology, November 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1177/0883073815614399 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jasna Jancic, Igor Petrusic, Vera Pavlovski, Zorica Savkovic, Dragana Vucinic, Zarko Martinovic |
| Abstract |
Although migraine represents one of the most common form of primary headache in the teenage population, most neurophysiologic studies are only on the adulthood. We investigated 38 teenage patients with migraine with aura, 17 male and 21 female, with a mean age of 16.2 years, comparing them with gender- and age-matched patients with migraine without aura and healthy subjects. Also, characteristics of aura were correlated with pattern-reversal visual evoked potential parameters. There was a significant difference in left and right eye N2 wave latencies between migraine with aura and migraine without aura patients or healthy controls. In migraine with aura and migraine without aura, 26.3% of patients had abnormal wave latency. Reported tunnel vision during the aura was correlated with lower N1P1 and/or P1N2 wave amplitudes. Also, higher amplitude in patients with migraine with aura correlated with younger age and earlier disease onset, whereas longer aura duration correlated with prolonged wave latency. Findings suggest that migraine subtypes may be differentiated on the basis of N2 wave latency prolongation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 11% |
| Researcher | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 11% |
| Other | 4 | 21% |
| Unknown | 4 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 16% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2016.
All research outputs
#13,216,332
of 22,832,057 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Child Neurology
#1,057
of 2,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,268
of 285,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Child Neurology
#5
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,832,057 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,369 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,322 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.