↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Development and validation of LC–MS/MS method for quantification of bictegravir in human plasma and its application to an intracellular uptake study
Published in
Biomedical Chromatography, October 2018
DOI 10.1002/bmc.4379
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

A sensitive liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method was developed and validated for quantification of bictegravir in human plasma. A small volume of only 50 μL aliquot of plasma was precipitated with acetonitrile containing an internal standard (IS). Chromatographic separation was performed on Kinetex EVO C18 column, 50 × 3.0 mm, 5 μm using an isocratic mobile phase containing 80:20 acetonitrile/water with 0.1% formic acid. A mass spectrometer operated in ESI positive multiple reaction monitoring mode using the m/z 450.1/289.1 for bictegravir and 420.1/277.1 for IS. The dynamic range of the method was 1 to 10,000 ng/mL with a correlation coefficient (r) ≥ 0.9991. The precision results of calibration standards were in the range of 0.05 to 4.57% and accuracies were 95.07 to 104.70%. The mean extraction recovery was found to be 98.64% with a precision of 2.91%. The method was validated as per USFDA guidelines and was found to be accurate and precise. The method was successfully applied to in-vitro cellular uptake study.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 14%
Student > Master 4 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Unknown 16 57%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 11%
Chemistry 2 7%
Unknown 16 57%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2018.
All research outputs
#21,885,607
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Biomedical Chromatography
#1,536
of 2,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#305,936
of 350,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biomedical Chromatography
#16
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,045 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,771 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.