Diagnosis of central nervous system (CNS) involvement in human African trypanosomiasis is crucial in determination of therapy. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and serum immunoglobulin concentrations, blood-CSF barrier dysfunction, pattern of intrathecal immunoglobulin synthesis, trypanosome-specific antibody synthesis, and CSF lactate concentrations were analyzed in 272 patients with Trypanosoma brucei gambiense infection. As part of the 2- or 3-class immune response, the predominant intrathecal IgM synthesis was the most sensitive (95%) marker for inflammation of the brain. We propose to replace the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria (white blood cell count >5 cells/microL and presence of trypanosomes in CSF) with a new approach for stage determination in trypanosomiasis: CNS involvement is diagnosed only in patients with >20 cells/microL or with intrathecal IgM synthesis, independent of the presence of trypanosomes in CSF. Compared with the use of these new criteria, the WHO criteria incorrectly classified 49 of 234 patients in the meningoencephalitic stage and 7 of 38 patients in the hemolymphatic disease stage. We also show that trypanosomiasis-related immunoglobulin patterns are of value in differential diagnosis.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2014.
All research outputs
#12,555,540
of 34,815,051 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Infectious Diseases
#11,362
of 19,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,004
of 90,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Infectious Diseases
#64
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,815,051 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,287 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.0. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,605 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
