Evaluating toxicological responses of engineered nanomaterials such as silica nanoparticles is critical in assessing health risks and exposure limits. Biological assays can be used to evaluate cytotoxicity of individual materials, but specific nano-bio interactions-which govern its physiological response-cannot currently be predicted from materials characterization and physicochemical properties. Understanding the role of free radical generation from nanomaterial surfaces facilitates understanding of a potential toxicity mechanism and provides insight into how toxic effects can be assessed. Size-matched mesoporous and nonporous silica nanoparticles in aminopropyl-functionalized and native forms were investigated to analyze the effects of porosity and surface functionalization on the observed cytotoxicity. In vitro cell viability data in a murine macrophage cell line (RAW 264.7) provides a model for what might be observed in terms of cellular toxicity upon an environmental or industrial exposure to silica nanoparticles. Electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy was implemented to study free radical species generated from the surface of these nanomaterials and the signal intensity was correlated with cellular toxicity. In addition, in vitro assay of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) matched well with both the EPR and cell viability data. Overall, spectroscopic and in vitro studies correlate well and implicate production of ROS from a surface-catalyzed reaction as a predictor of cellular toxicity. The data demonstrate that mesoporous materials are intrinsically less toxic than nonporous materials, and that surface functionalization can mitigate toxicity in nonporous materials by reducing free radical production. The broader implications are in terms of safety by design of nanomaterials, which can only be extracted by mechanistic studies such as the ones reported here.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2016.
All research outputs
#6,258,624
of 30,069,453 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science: Nano
#181
of 1,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,141
of 411,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science: Nano
#19
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 30,069,453 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,572 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 411,484 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
