↓ Skip to main content

Single-molecule visualization of a formin-capping protein ‘decision complex’ at the actin filament barbed end

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Single-molecule visualization of a formin-capping protein ‘decision complex’ at the actin filament barbed end
Published in
Nature Communications, November 2015
DOI 10.1038/ncomms9707
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Precise control of actin filament length is essential to many cellular processes. Formins processively elongate filaments, whereas capping protein (CP) binds to barbed ends and arrests polymerization. While genetic and biochemical evidence has indicated that these two proteins function antagonistically, the mechanism underlying the antagonism has remained unresolved. Here we use multi-wavelength single-molecule fluorescence microscopy to observe the fully reversible formation of a long-lived 'decision complex' in which a CP dimer and a dimer of the formin mDia1 simultaneously bind the barbed end. Further, mDia1 displaced from the barbed end by CP can randomly slide along the filament and later return to the barbed end to re-form the complex. Quantitative kinetic analysis reveals that the CP-mDia1 antagonism that we observe in vitro occurs through the decision complex. Our observations suggest new molecular mechanisms for the control of actin filament length and for the capture of filament barbed ends in cells.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
India 2 2%
Japan 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 85 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 24%
Researcher 21 23%
Student > Bachelor 11 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Student > Master 7 8%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 18 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 25%
Chemistry 6 7%
Physics and Astronomy 4 4%
Chemical Engineering 3 3%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 19 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2016.
All research outputs
#16,586,005
of 27,625,762 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#53,099
of 66,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,834
of 295,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#573
of 735 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,625,762 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 66,044 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 53.4. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,001 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 735 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.