↓ Skip to main content

Estrogen Receptor Alpha as a Key Target of Red Wine Polyphenols Action on the Endothelium

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Estrogen Receptor Alpha as a Key Target of Red Wine Polyphenols Action on the Endothelium
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0008554
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

A greater reduction in cardiovascular risk and vascular protection associated with diet rich in polyphenols are generally accepted; however, the molecular targets for polyphenols effects remain unknown. Meanwhile evidences in the literature have enlightened, not only structural similarities between estrogens and polyphenols known as phytoestrogens, but also in their vascular effects. We hypothesized that alpha isoform of estrogen receptor (ERalpha) could be involved in the transduction of the vascular benefits of polyphenols.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
France 2 2%
Canada 2 2%
Italy 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Unknown 92 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 17%
Other 10 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 8%
Student > Master 5 5%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 23 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 9%
Neuroscience 4 4%
Chemistry 4 4%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 30 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2014.
All research outputs
#5,153,854
of 34,454,098 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#53,053
of 224,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,078
of 234,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#231
of 826 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,454,098 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,780 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 234,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 826 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.