↓ Skip to main content

Guidelines for the Evaluation and Treatment of Perimenopausal Depression: Summary and Recommendations

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Women's Health, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#37 of 2,752)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
43 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
13 X users
patent
3 patents
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
1 Redditor
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
346 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Guidelines for the Evaluation and Treatment of Perimenopausal Depression: Summary and Recommendations
Published in
Journal of Women's Health, February 2019
DOI 10.1089/jwh.2018.27099.mensocrec
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pauline M. Maki, Susan G. Kornstein, Hadine Joffe, Joyce T. Bromberger, Ellen W. Freeman, Geena Athappilly, William V. Bobo, Leah H. Rubin, Hristina K. Koleva, Lee S. Cohen, Claudio N. Soares, on behalf of the Board of Trustees for The North American Menopause Society and the Women and Mood Disorders Task Force of the National Network of Depression Centers

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 346 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 346 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 35 10%
Student > Master 26 8%
Researcher 22 6%
Other 19 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 5%
Other 47 14%
Unknown 181 52%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 8%
Psychology 27 8%
Neuroscience 13 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 2%
Other 20 6%
Unknown 193 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 325. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2026.
All research outputs
#130,669
of 34,457,357 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Women's Health
#37
of 2,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,358
of 498,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Women's Health
#1
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,457,357 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,752 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 498,645 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.