↓ Skip to main content

Parmbsc1: a refined force field for DNA simulations

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Methods, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
9 X users
patent
6 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
576 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Parmbsc1: a refined force field for DNA simulations
Published in
Nature Methods, November 2015
DOI 10.1038/nmeth.3658
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We present parmbsc1, a force field for DNA atomistic simulation, which has been parameterized from high-level quantum mechanical data and tested for nearly 100 systems (representing a total simulation time of ∼140 μs) covering most of DNA structural space. Parmbsc1 provides high-quality results in diverse systems. Parameters and trajectories are available at http://mmb.irbbarcelona.org/ParmBSC1/.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 576 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Unknown 570 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 143 25%
Researcher 90 16%
Student > Master 46 8%
Student > Bachelor 42 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 5%
Other 61 11%
Unknown 168 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 142 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 97 17%
Physics and Astronomy 42 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 7%
Engineering 13 2%
Other 56 10%
Unknown 186 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 80. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2026.
All research outputs
#680,985
of 34,526,284 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#765
of 6,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,130
of 297,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#8
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,526,284 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,448 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,242 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.