↓ Skip to main content

Incidental Learning of Rewarded Associations Bolsters Learning on an Associative Task

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory & Cognition, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Incidental Learning of Rewarded Associations Bolsters Learning on an Associative Task
Published in
Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory & Cognition, January 2016
DOI 10.1037/xlm0000201
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Reward has been shown to change behavior as a result of incentive learning (by motivating the individual to increase their effort) and instrumental learning (by increasing the frequency of a particular behavior). However, Palminteri et al. (2011) demonstrated that reward can also improve the incidental learning of a motor skill even when participants are unaware of the relationship between the reward and the motor act. Nonetheless, it remains unknown whether these effects of reward are the indirect results of manipulations of top-down factors. To identify the locus of the benefit associated with rewarded incidental learning, we used a chord-learning task (Seibel, 1963) in which the correct performance of some chords was consistently rewarded with points necessary to complete the block whereas the correct performance of other chords was not rewarded. Following training, participants performed a transfer phase without reward and then answered a questionnaire to assess explicit awareness about the rewards. Experiment 1 revealed that rewarded chords were performed more quickly than unrewarded chords, and there was little awareness about the relationship between chords and reward. Experiment 2 obtained similar findings with simplified responses to show that the advantage for rewarded stimulus combinations reflected more efficient binding of stimulus-response (S-R) associations, rather than a response bias for rewarded associations or improved motor learning. These results indicate that rewards can be used to significantly improve the learning of S-R associations without directly manipulating top-down factors. (PsycINFO Database Record

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Unknown 47 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 16%
Student > Master 7 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Researcher 6 12%
Professor 3 6%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 13 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 16 33%
Neuroscience 4 8%
Sports and Recreations 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Arts and Humanities 2 4%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 13 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2015.
All research outputs
#28,676,353
of 34,454,098 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory & Cognition
#2,665
of 3,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#350,476
of 446,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory & Cognition
#44
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,454,098 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,007 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,543 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.