Multiwalled carbon nanotube-titanium dioxide (MWNT-TiO2) nanohybrids (NHs), a promising support for electrocatalysts, have a high likelihood of environmental release. Aggregation of these NHs may or may not be captured by the sum of their component behavior, thus necessitating a systematic evaluation. This study probes the "part-whole question" by systematically evaluating the role of TiO2 loading (C:Ti molar ratios of 1:0.1, 1:0.05 and 1:0.033) on the aggregation behavior of these NHs. Aggregation kinetics of these in-house synthesized (using a sol-gel method) NHs and the components is investigated with time-resolved dynamic light scattering in the presence of mono- and divalent cations and with and without Suwannee River humic acid. A deviation in the aggregation behavior from classical electrokinetic theory has been observed which indicates that the material complexity has a strong influence in the observed behavior; hence other material attributes (e.g., fractal dimension, surface roughness, charge heterogeneity, etc.) should be carefully considered when studying such materials. The sum of the aggregation behavior of the parts may not capture that of the whole (i.e., of the NHs); aggregation depends on the TiO2 loading and also on the hybridization process and the background aquatic chemistry.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2018.
All research outputs
#18,893,608
of 27,396,316 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science & Technology
#18,143
of 22,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,287
of 346,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science & Technology
#182
of 245 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,396,316 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,185 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.1. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,960 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 245 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
