↓ Skip to main content

Medications used to treat nausea and vomiting of pregnancy and the risk of selected birth defects

Overview of attention for article published in Birth Defects Research Part A: Clinical and Molecular Teratology, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#12 of 576)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Medications used to treat nausea and vomiting of pregnancy and the risk of selected birth defects
Published in
Birth Defects Research Part A: Clinical and Molecular Teratology, November 2011
DOI 10.1002/bdra.22865
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Nausea and vomiting of pregnancy (NVP) occurs in up to 80% of pregnant women, but its association with birth outcomes is not clear. Several medications are used for the treatment of NVP; however, data are limited on their possible associations with birth defects.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 134 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 22 16%
Researcher 13 10%
Student > Postgraduate 12 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Student > Master 10 7%
Other 32 24%
Unknown 35 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 60 45%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 4%
Neuroscience 2 1%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 38 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 99. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2025.
All research outputs
#534,080
of 33,779,198 outputs
Outputs from Birth Defects Research Part A: Clinical and Molecular Teratology
#12
of 576 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,494
of 299,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Birth Defects Research Part A: Clinical and Molecular Teratology
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,779,198 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 576 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,067 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them