↓ Skip to main content

Helminth infection, fecundity, and age of first pregnancy in women

Overview of attention for article published in Science, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
224 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Helminth infection, fecundity, and age of first pregnancy in women
Published in
Science, November 2015
DOI 10.1126/science.aac7902
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Infection with intestinal helminths results in immunological changes that influence co-infections, and might influence fecundity by inducing immunological states affecting conception and pregnancy. We investigated associations between intestinal helminths and fertility in women, using 9 years of longitudinal data from 986 Bolivian forager-horticulturalists, experiencing natural fertility and 70% helminth prevalence. We found that different species of helminth are associated with contrasting effects on fecundity. Infection with roundworm (Ascaris lumbricoides) is associated with earlier first births and shortened interbirth intervals, whereas infection with hookworm is associated with delayed first pregnancy and extended interbirth intervals. Thus, helminths may have important effects on human fertility that reflect physiological and immunological consequences of infection.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7,070 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 224 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Unknown 216 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 40 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 14%
Student > Bachelor 30 13%
Student > Master 27 12%
Other 12 5%
Other 43 19%
Unknown 41 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 31 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 9%
Social Sciences 19 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 17 8%
Other 41 18%
Unknown 48 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1222. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2026.
All research outputs
#14,148
of 34,614,958 outputs
Outputs from Science
#696
of 94,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105
of 441,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#2
of 1,269 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,614,958 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 94,218 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,263 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,269 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.