↓ Skip to main content

Relationship between FKBP5 polymorphisms and depression symptoms among kidney transplant recipients

Overview of attention for article published in Depression & Anxiety (1091-4269), August 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Relationship between FKBP5 polymorphisms and depression symptoms among kidney transplant recipients
Published in
Depression & Anxiety (1091-4269), August 2011
DOI 10.1002/da.20879
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Several polymorphisms in FK506 Binding Protein gene (FKBP5) and a history of child abuse have been shown to be associated with an increased risk for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). It has also been demonstrated that the same polymorphisms of FKBP5 are associated with increased recurrence of depressive episodes and rapid response to antidepressant treatment. However, there are only limited numbers of studies replicating the polymorphisms as vulnerability factors for the development of mental illnesses, such as PTSD and depression after stressful life event, especially with a specific incidence, such as kidney transplant surgery.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Mexico 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 83 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 16%
Researcher 12 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 16 19%
Unknown 19 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 22 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 7%
Social Sciences 5 6%
Philosophy 2 2%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 20 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2011.
All research outputs
#27,870,620
of 34,518,147 outputs
Outputs from Depression & Anxiety (1091-4269)
#1,641
of 1,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,386
of 172,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Depression & Anxiety (1091-4269)
#29
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,518,147 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,866 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,616 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.