↓ Skip to main content

Smartphone-Based Real-Time Indoor Location Tracking With 1-m Precision

Overview of attention for article published in IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Smartphone-Based Real-Time Indoor Location Tracking With 1-m Precision
Published in
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, November 2015
DOI 10.1109/jbhi.2015.2500439
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Monitoring the activities of daily living of the elderly at home is widely recognized as useful for the detection of new or deteriorating health conditions. However, the accuracy of existing indoor location tracking systems remains unsatisfactory. The aim of this study was therefore to develop a localization system that can identify a patient's real-time location in a home environment with maximum estimation error of two meters at a 95% confidence level. A proof-of-concept system based on a sensor fusion approach was built with considerations for lower cost, reduced intrusiveness, and higher mobility, deployability, and portability. This involved the development of both a step detector using the accelerometer and compass of an iPhone 5, and a radio-based localization subsystem using a Kalman filter and received signal strength indication (RSSI) to tackle issues that had been identified as limiting accuracy. The results of our experiments were promising with an average estimation error of 0.47 meters. We are confident that with the proposed future work our design can be adapted to a home-like environment with a more robust localization solution.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 75 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 20%
Student > Bachelor 10 13%
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Researcher 6 8%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 17 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 17 23%
Engineering 11 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 11%
Psychology 5 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 26 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2015.
All research outputs
#20,657,128
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
#1,430
of 1,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#214,413
of 293,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age from IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
#10
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,825 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,261 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.